Wednesday, May 1, 2013

website

Sea Shepard

http://www.seashepherd.org/who-we-are/


in the "Who We Are " Section

Sea Shepherd's Mission Statement

Established in 1977, Sea Shepherd Conservation Society (SSCS) is an international non-profit, marine wildlife conservation organization. Our mission is to end the destruction of habitat and slaughter of wildlife in the world's oceans in order to conserve and protect ecosystems and species.

Sea Shepherd uses innovative direct-action tactics to investigate, document, and take action when necessary to expose and confront illegal activities on the high seas. By safeguarding the biodiversity of our delicately-balanced ocean ecosystems, Sea Shepherd works to ensure their survival for future generations.

More about Sea Shepherd:

Laws and charters that guide our activities
Mandate - as provided by the U.N. World Charter for Nature
Our Equality Statement outlines the truth about what does and doesn't motivate our work

new york times article

EXHIBITION REVIEW

What Drove Captain Ahab Wild

‘Whales,’ at the American Museum of Natural History

Agaton Strom for The New York Times
Whales: Giants of the Deep The skeletons of sperm whales found in 2003, at the American Museum of Natural History.More Photos »
  • FACEBOOK
  • TWITTER
  • GOOGLE+
  • SAVE
  • E-MAIL
  • SHARE
  • PRINT
  • REPRINTS
Perhaps you will approach the new exhibition at the American Museum of Natural History already entranced by its subject,“Whales: Giants of the Deep.” Perhaps you have already felt the allure of the 94-foot-long fiberglass blue whale suspended in oceanic darkness at the heart of the museum — a model of one of the largest animals that have ever lived on earth. Or from reading Melville’s “Moby-Dick,” where every aspect of a whale’s life and death quivers with metaphoric resonance.
Multimedia
Arts Twitter Logo.

Connect With Us on Twitter

Follow@nytimesarts for arts and entertainment news.
Arts & Entertainment Guide
A sortable calendar of noteworthy cultural events in the New York region, selected by Times critics.
But even if you have never given these creatures much consideration, spend some time in this show and you will begin to see why they have haunted so many seafaring cultures, and why, even after being hunted to near extinction, the largest of their species still exude a commanding power and mystery.
Of course, immensity comes into play. The skeleton of a 58.4-foot-long male sperm whale — collected in 2003 as a result of a mass stranding of whales on a beach in West Auckland, New Zealand — is suspended at the exhibition’s center, adjacent to a smaller female. They loom over the video kiosks, wall panels and specimens, as if daring anything to come too close.
Nearby, children can climb inside a plastic model of a blue whale’s heart (which, in a live whale, can weigh more than 1,400 pounds). You can use touch screens to examine the internal organs of whales. But these displays are in the shadow of the chambers and curves of whalebone filling the high-ceilinged gallery.
More amazing than size, though, is what we see when we look more closely. These two sperm whales are stripped of the oils and monumental blubber that made them such valuable plunder for fuel seekers, revealing their inner structure. Yet while skeletons generally seem like the frames of living shapes, that is not the case here. The cubic bulk of the whale’s head is gone. The top of the skull is actually a concave scoop of curiously thin plates that thrust forward and split apart, looking like a forked bird’s beak. And while the bottom of the jaw is lined with thick, close-set teeth, it is as peculiarly narrow as it is long, like a protuberance designed for probing.
And the skeleton’s overall shape? Appendages looking like little hands protrude from its sides, like forgotten limbs. The spine sleekly curves, shrinking toward the tail. The animal seems like something that slithers with the currents rather than plows the deep; it even has some resemblances to a bird or a lizard. But we know otherwise. It is a mammal. It breathes air. And it lives like a fish.
So this is the largest toothed predator of the animal kingdom? It is as if having distilled the whale into its structural essence, we end up with something even more mysterious, testing the boundaries of all familiar categories. And I haven’t even described the most startling sights here, offered almost too soon to be absorbed, right after entering the exhibition.
This show is unusual for this museum since it originated elsewhere, at the Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, which has one of the largest whale collections in the world. But in its original form, the exhibition seems to have devoted almost as much attention to the use of these creatures by New Zealand’s indigenous Maori as to the world’s cetaceans — an order of more than 80 species of living whales, dolphins and porpoises — and their ancestors.
Bilingual Maori signage remains, along with a disproportionate attention to that culture’s homage to whales. (The curator for this material is Rhonda Paku of the New Zealand museum.) But the American museum’s curators, including John J. Flynn, Frick curator of fossil mammals, have shifted the emphasis. They have added important fossil evidence from the Museum of Natural History, along with American whaling artifacts (including the logbook from the whaler William Rotch, sailing out of New Bedford, Mass., in the early 1830s).
Two cases of whale-themed artifacts from the museum’s collection from indigenous cultures in the Arctic, South America and the Pacific Northwest are also here, including a killer whale mask from British Columbia, an ancient Peruvian trumpet decorated with a killer whale carrying a severed human head, and an Inuit engraving of whales on a walrus tusk. These objects provide a larger context for the exhibition’s elaborate display of a Maori pataka (storehouse), in which whalebone weapons and cloak pins are shown.Whale myths seem pretty nigh universal.
Ultimately, though, these displays don’t let us fully comprehend the cultural significance of whales, even for the Maori; we simply are not given enough context. Indigenous peoples function here mostly as an environmental chastisement, which, presented with the facts, seems well deserved.
“At the peak of U.S. whaling, in 1853,” we learn, “Americans killed more than 8,000 whales.” But in the 20th century, about 350,000 blue whales were killed by the whale trade, leaving only about 2,000 alive. “It was estimated,” we read, “that Japanese, Danish, British, Dutch and Soviet Russian fleets collectively killed a fifth of the whales in the Southern Ocean in the 1957-58 season alone.” By the 1970s, the conservation movement had gained ground.
But we cannot feel the extent of that loss from the indigenous artifacts. Instead it emerges from the exhibition’s attentiveness to fossil evidence and biology, where we can glimpse the origins of the whale’s power and mystery.
The first object we see here, in fact, is an enormous skull found in the Gobi Desert in 1923, belonging to Andrewsarchus mongoliensis, an animal that probably walked on all fours, possessed hooves and fur, and might have been 12 feet long and 6 feet high, “the largest meat-eating land mammal ever.” It was, we learn, likely from the same branch of the mammal family tree as hippos, and from the same animal group as deer, pigs and camels. It was also an ancestor of the whale.
We ordinarily think of evolution as leading creatures out of the sea, but here the reverse happened: whales evolved from four-footed land mammals beginning some 55 million years ago, in the midst of an era of global heating. The “first whale,” we are told, was the snoutish, four-legged Pakicetus attocki. Such animals ultimately became “sea invaders” and diversified further. Some whales, with teeth, came to use sound for navigation; others developed plates of baleen, fine fringes of nail-like fibers in their mouths to trap swarms of small prey.
This strange evolutionary path, leading from land back to the sea, must leave a subliminal trace affecting human perceptions of whales (along with dolphins and porpoises). In Maori legend, whales are ridden by powerful and magical beings, as horses and land animals might have been. Many cultures also have stories of humans swallowed by whales and dwelling within them, as if there were some intimate connections between our realms.
Whales’ mammalian skeletons seem to speak of multiple worlds, their strange skulls hosting cavities and pathways that allow the production of underwater sound. In dolphins, air is forced through vibrating flaps of flesh; the sound is transmitted through their foreheads’ fatty tissue. Toothed whales direct sound by bouncing it off air sacs in their nasal cavities; a sperm whale’s nose is at least a quarter of the length of its body. You can listen to such sounds here, ranging from clicks and squeals to the deep trumpeting of the blue whale that can be heard 620 miles away.
Sniff here, too, at a chunk of ambergris, “gray amber,” once used in the ancient Middle East as a spice and incense, and later as a fixative for perfumes. “You might have heard that sperm whales vomit up ambergris,” we are told. “Since it forms in the intestines, however, it’s more likely to exit the whale at the other end.”
How could such animals not be sacred and mysterious? All categories are confounded and expectations overturned. We begin to understand whales through the archaeology and analysis of science, but before their reality, we stand humbled.
Follow Edward Rothstein on Twitter, twitter.com/EdRothstein.
“Whales: Giants of the Deep” is on view through Jan. 5 at the American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street; (212) 769-5100, amnh.org.

evaluation of book

subject specific encyclopedia

web of knowledge article

original
Genetic evidence of illegal trade in protected whales links Japan with the US and South Korea
Author(s): Baker, CS (Baker, C. Scott)[ 1,2 ] ; Steel, D (Steel, Debbie)[ 1,2 ] ; Choi, Y (Choi, Yeyong)[ 3 ] ; Lee, H (Lee, Hang)[ 4 ] ; Kim, KS (Kim, Kyung Seok)[ 4 ] ; Choi, SK (Choi, Sung Kyoung)[ 4 ] ; Ma, YU (Ma, Yong-Un)[ 5 ] ; Hambleton, C (Hambleton, Charles)[ 6 ] ; Psihoyos, L (Psihoyos, Louie)[ 6 ] ; Brownell, RL (Brownell, R. L.)[ 7 ]; Funahashi, N (Funahashi, Naoko)[ 8 ]
Source: BIOLOGY LETTERS  Volume: 6   Issue: 5   Pages: 647-650   DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0239   Published: OCT 23 2010
Times Cited: 4 (from Web of Science)
Cited References: 13      [ view related records ]     Citation MapCitation Map     
Abstract: We report on genetic identification of 'whale meat' purchased in sushi restaurants in Los Angeles, CA (USA) in October 2009 and in Seoul, South Korea in June and September 2009. Phylogenetic analyses of mtDNA cytochrome b sequences confirmed that the products included three species of whale currently killed in the controversial scientific whaling programme of Japan, but which are protected from international trade: the fin, sei and Antarctic minke. The DNA profile of the fin whale sold in Seoul established a match to products purchased previously in Japan in September 2007, confirming unauthorized trade between these two countries. Following species identification, these products were handed over to the appropriate national or local authorities for further investigation. The illegal trade of products from protected species of whales, presumably taken under a national permit for scientific research, is a timely reminder of the need for independent, transparent and robust monitoring of any future whaling.                                                                                                                                                                                                                 


)
 
 A truer measure of the market: the molecular ecology of fisheries and wildlife trade
Author(s): Baker, C. Scott
Source: MOLECULAR ECOLOGY  Volume: 17   Issue: 18   Pages: 3985-3998   DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03867.x   Published: SEP 2008
Times Cited: 33 (from All Databases)
 
: Estimating the number of whales entering trade using DNA profiling and capture-recapture analysis of market products
Author(s): Baker, C. Scott; Cooke, Justin G.; Lavery, Shane; et al.
Source: MOLECULAR ECOLOGY  Volume: 16   Issue: 13   Pages: 2617-2626   DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03317.x   Published: JUL 2007
Times Cited: 24 (from All Databases)
 
 
 
 




Wednesday, April 17, 2013

scholarly article



The Whaling Dispute in the South Pacific: An Australian Perspective.
Authors:
Davis, Ruth1 rdavis@uow.edu.au
Source:
Journal of East Asia & International Law. Autumn2011, Vol. 4 Issue 2, p419-447. 29p.
Document Type:
Article
Subject Terms:
*ACTIONS & defenses (Law)
*WHALING
*INTERNATIONAL law
Geographic Terms:
JAPAN
Author-Supplied Keywords:
International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling
International Whaling Commission
Japanese whaling
Scientific Whaling
Southern Ocean
Whaling Litigation
Company/Entity:
INTERNATIONAL Court of Justice
Abstract:
In May 2010 Australia commenced litigation against Japan in the International Court of Justice over the legality of Japanese scientific whaling in the Southern Ocean. This article considers the background to the litigation, the basis of Australia's opposition to whaling, and the grounds upon which Australia is mounting its challenge. The interpretation of the 1946 International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling and the operation of the International Whaling Commission are considered in light of the precautionary principle. The article concludes that Australia's success depends upon a broad reading of the Convention that takes into account its objects and purposes, as well as wider developments in international law. Any guidance that the International Court of Justice can provide on the modern interpretation of this now dated Convention is to be welcomed.[ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
 
Copyright of Journal of East Asia & International Law is the property of Yijun Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.Copyright applies to all Abstracts.
Author Affiliations:
1Lecturer, Faculty of Law, University of Wollongong
ISSN:
19769229
Accession Number:
69620604
Database:
Academic Search Complete

Monday, April 8, 2013

book from lsu library

Report on whaling activities conducted by nationals of Iceland [electronic resource] : message from the President of the United States transmitting a report regarding certification by the Secretary of Commerce that Iceland has conducted whaling activities that diminish the effectiveness of a conservation program of the International Whaling Commission (IWC),

author
United States. President (2009- : Obama)

description
online resource